The Masonic Centre, Sydney.
It's probably one of the most controversial
buildings in Sydney, squatting for decades as a big, brutal presence on
the corner of Castlereagh and Goulburn streets, and until now, unfinished.
By next month, however, 30 years after it was built, the NSW Masonic
Centre will finally be completed with a 24-storey tower that was designed
in 1974.
When Nick Lucas, Grocon's head of
development for NSW and Queensland, bought the rights to the air space
above the Masonic Centre, they came with plans for a contemporary glass
curtain-wall tower "but we preferred the original design", he
said this week. In fact, said Lucas, "we believe the '70s are back in
fashion".
This may be bad news for those who would
prefer that the 1970s - and in particular, the "new brutalist"
style of architecture which had a brief Sydney heyday in that decade -
stayed safely buried. Elizabeth Farrelly, the Herald's architecture
critic, once described the Masonic Centre as "one of the least
endearing buildings on Earth ... no one has ever loved it, nor ever
will". Many agreed.
Even those most deeply committed to the
architecture of the 20th century can be ambivalent. Jacqueline Urford, who
chairs the heritage committee of the Royal Australian Institute of
Architects, says this is "most brutal of the brutalist
buildings", adding that "I admire it because it stands for what
it is - but I can't say I love it".
But Dr Harry Margalit, an architecture
lecturer at the University of Sydney, differs. "Without doubt there
will come a time when it is loved, and I think that time is not far
away," he says. He also says it could be listed as "a companion
piece to the Opera House, one which illuminates the evolution of
architectural ideas both in Sydney and abroad". On a national
ranking, he says, "its overall significance ... is of the highest
order".
Andrew Andersons, of PTW, the architects
carrying out the original Joseland Gilling plans for the tower, agrees.
Aware of the original Max Dupain photographs (two of which are reproduced
here), he says that "it's not an ugly building; it's just an
unfinished building" and it makes "a big sculptural contribution
to the street".
For whatever reason - good or bad - it's a
building few people can ignore. In Urford's words, "you can't say it
does anything meekly" and it belongs in a series built in Sydney from
the '70s to the early '80s that includes the Supreme Court and the
Elizabeth Street law school, the Sydney Water building on Bathurst Street,
Sydney University's Wentworth Building on City Road, the Warringah Civic
Centre in Dee Why and the UTS campus at Ku-ring-gai.
In Canberra, the High Court and the
National Gallery made their very firm marks while in Perth, Margalit says,
there is "a wonderful collection [of brutalist buildings], some of
the best in the world" including "almost the whole of the Curtin
University campus, some buildings downtown and a string of mainly
government buildings along the shore".
THE brutalist movement had begun in England
in the '50s, led by Peter and Alison Smithson, but did not percolate
through to Australia until much later, with Joseland Gilling producing the
Masonic Centre (and the Qantas building near Wynyard). In the same era the
Government Architect's office produced the Ku-ring-gai campus while
Edwards Madigan designed the Warringah Civic Centre, which Urford says was
virtually a prototype for the High Court in Canberra.
Margalit says: "These buildings will
not come again; for one thing, they would be too expensive to build now.
They were built in the negative - by pouring concrete in the form, then
stripping it away. So to build a spiral stair in concrete, as they did at
the Masonic Centre - well, that sort of work takes a long time to put
together.
"The quality of the construction is
extraordinary; the tolerances are incredibly fine; it's beautifully made.
And very few buildings can match its interior quality" - an opinion
with which Andersons concurs, adding that it has been "beautifully
maintained and is in perfect condition". His firm's work on
completing the centre has been "a chance to regain an icon that was
almost lost", a "rescue mission ... for one of Sydney's most
remarkable sites".
It has been luckier than some of its
companion buildings are likely to be. The Warringah centre has been
earmarked as the site for a new hospital while at Ku-ring-gai, UTS has
decided to vacate its Sulman-award winning building, leaving it and its
site up for grabs. Ian de Vulder, a former Ku-ring-gai councillor, says a
significant feature of the complex is "the way it used the whole
landscape and melded the buildings into it", which is also at risk if
the site is redeveloped.
A striking feature of the Ku-ring-gai
building is its large, top-lit internal street - an element Margalit
traces to the "social program" of these buildings. "It's
the generous circulation spaces that were designed to make them sociable
buildings, with places for people to gather: at UTS Ku-ring-gai, it's that
internal street; the Wilkinson building has generous spaces around its
stairs; there's the enormous foyer between the two halls at the Masonic
Centre and UTS Broadway also has a fantastic foyer, though the tower
itself is not so good," he says.
"There was a certain brutal honesty
about materials in concert with concern for creating social spaces. It's
as if they were saying it's no good having a pretty building with no
heart."