|
|
| sydney architecture |
| sydney site map |
 |
| Sydney Architecture
Images- Western Suburbs Rouse Hill House Historic Houses Trust |
|
|
architect |
Richard Rouse |
|
location |
Windsor Rd, Rouse Hill |
|
date |
1813-18 |
|
style |
Old Colonial Georgian |
|
construction |
stone |
|
type |
House |
  |
|
|
A Brief History Richard Rouse (1774-1852) appears to have begun building at Rouse Hill in 1813 although the grant of 450 acres was not made until October 1816. Sometime between 1818 and 1825 Rouse, his wife Elizabeth (1772-1849) and their family moved from Parramatta to the new house. The son of an Oxfordshire cabinet maker and shop-keeper, Rouse came to the colony, free, in 1801. Prospering quickly, by 1805 he was Superintendent of Public Works and Convicts at Parramatta. In this role he supervised the building of Governor and Mrs Macquarie's additions to Government House, Parramatta in the mid 1810s. It is possible that these works influenced Rouse to build a bigger house than he first intended, adding larger, longer rooms behind the front range. He sited his new house prominently, and possibly with an eye to its possible use as an inn, on the hilltop adjacent to the toll house (also built by him) on the Parramatta to Windsor Turnpike. Rouse acquired other properties, more fertile than the Rouse Hill estate, but Rouse Hill had the advantage of its strategic siting. While other early colonial homesteads overlooked their crops or pastures, Rouse Hill has always overlooked the busy Windsor Road. It was from here that Rouse and his descendants oversaw their distant pastoral and agricultural interests, rather than the estate itself being the focus of those interests. Rouse was not bred to the land, but was shrewd and capable, careful of money and acquisitive of property. He left, on his death in 1852, extensive holdings throughout the colony. His second son, Edwin (1806-1862), inherited Rouse Hill. With his English-born wife, Hannah (nee Hipkins), Edwin brought the plain, solid Georgian house up to date. After years of living at Guntawang, the principal family property west of the mountains, Edwin and Hannah renovated Rouse Hill, probably engaging the architect-builder James Houison. They added the canopied verandah and the two storeyed service wing, installed marble chimney pieces on the ground floor and bought furniture in the fashionable Louis revival style. It was Edwin Rouse's other land holdings, beyond the mountains, rather than the Rouse Hill estate, that supported the Rouse family. This wealth was enjoyed into the next generation by Edwin's son, Edwin Stephen Rouse who, aged twelve, inherited Rouse Hill on his father's early death in 1862. Edwin Stephen (1849-1931) married well, in 1874, and Bessie Buchanan (1843-1924) became the mistress of Rouse Hill. (His mother, Hannah, lived much of the remainder of her life in England with two of her daughters). Again the house was redecorated, in Bessie's fashionable taste for Art Decoration, while Edwin Stephen improved the estate, notably by the building of impressive stables in 1876 designed by the architect John Horbury Hunt. Edwin and Bessie's two daughters, Nina and Kathleen were born in 1875 and 1878, into the leisurely confident world of the late 19th century squattocracy, but the financial troubles of the 1890s - the economic depression that affected city and country alike - cast shadows over this sunlit landscape of picnic races, house parties and seasons in town. Those shadows grew with the 20th century and Edwin Stephen's lack of business sense. In 1895 Nina Rouse made a socially suitable match with George Terry of nearby Box Hill, where they lived extravagantly for a few years and brought up their five sons, but returned to Rouse Hill, bankrupt and resented by Kathleen, soon after Bessie's death in 1924. Kathleen, in love with a Latvian emigreé refused residency in Australia and working in Manchuria, travelled to see him in 1930 and again two years later. She never returned from Manchuria; in August 1932 she was murdered in Harbin. The exclusion of her sister and her nephews as beneficiaries of her will caused further conflict within the family and the furnishings of the house narrowly escaped dispersal. Nina and George Terry remained at Rouse Hill, George dying in 1957. Nina lived on with her reminiscences and the remnants of an affluent past until her death in 1968. As her grand-daughter, Caroline Thornton has written 'Granny seemed to hold the key to another world'. Attrition of the estate through subdivision left only 100 acres, but in and around the house little was changed, little was added. Nina's son, Gerald, and his family lived in the cottage beyond the farmyard; another son Roderick lived nearby. After further subdivision between her sons, all that remained of the estate was 20 acres (13 hectares) in the ownership of Gerald and Roderick Terry. In 1977 Roderick sold his share of Rouse Hill to his daughter Miriam, and her husband Ian Hamilton. Gerald Terry and the Hamiltons held Rouse Hill as equal co-owners until its compulsory acquisition by the New South Wales Government in 1978. Gerald sold his share of the contents to the Government, and together with his wife and his brother Roderick, was allowed to remain living in the house. Roderick shared his quarters with the Hamiltons until his death in 1980. When the Hamiltons were subsequently asked to leave they complained to the State Ombudsman, but despite the Ombudsman's finding that the Planning and Environment Commission's past conduct was 'wrong' and 'unreasonable' the Hamiltons were evicted from Rouse Hill in 1983. Not wishing to separate the contents from the house, the Hamiltons left their half share of the contents in situ. The real estate and the Government's half share of the collection were transferred to the Historic Houses Trust from the Department of Planning in 1986 and a new period of negotiation with the family began. In 1987 the Trust leased the Hamiltons' collection and in 1994 it was acquired by Rouse Hill Hamilton Collection Pty Ltd, a private company jointly managed by the Historic Houses Trust and the Hamilton family. In 1996 the Historic Houses Trust acquired a small residual collection from Gerald Terry. Mr Terry continued living in the house until 1993 when he moved to a hostel for the aged. He retained the right to live at Rouse Hill, which he regarded as his home, until his death in February 1999. With the goodwill of the family Rouse Hill's completeness has now been assured. Conservation work has continued and the collection has been catalogued. Rouse Hill estate was opened to the public in 1999. The Garden Clearing and Climate Before European settlement Aborigines were attracted to the area now occupied by the Rouse Hill estate by freshwater shellfish in the stream, and by the shelter of the denser tree cover along its banks. Richard Rouse (1774-1852) sought the free-draining rise above Second Ponds Creek as ideal land for his sheep and horses. The surrounding open woodland was dominated by grey box and forest red gum, with some narrow-leafed ironbark on ridges, and these timbers were used for early slab buildings and fences on Rouse Hill. Clearing and stumping began as early as 1810 and the shelter afforded by timber was lost almost immediately. By 1890 almost the entire district had been cleared, some areas more than once. Rouse Hill is a dry garden established on an exposed shale ridge in a rain shadow area. It is in a climate where plant damage from low rainfall in late winter may be exacerbated by frosts and strong winds, and a dry spring may extend into summer drought. Of Grass and Grove The first garden at Rouse Hill was a subsistence plot for the toll house. It was well established by 1816, but it is unlikely to have been on the site of today's garden. The present garden was fenced in 1817, as the main house was being completed. Richard and his wife Elizabeth (1772-1849) were in residence at Rouse Hill by 1825. At this time the garden acquired its basic decorative elements. The squared form emerged, with gravel paths laid and edged in the ordered vernacular forerunner to Gardenesque, familiar to the Rouses from England and used locally in the garden of Government House, Sydney. Vistas were accentuated by paths extending from the newly-defined carriage sweep. Stone pines, and at least two oaks raised from acorns reputedly from Governor Macquarie, were planted along the Windsor Road frontage. The hedge of African olive was established between drive and garden before 1859, and the Moreton Bay figs now flanking the front of the house were being nurtured in pots, covered by casks against the frost. Specimens such as funeral pines and early hibiscus were introduced. In the furthest section to the east of the house Richard developed a citrus orchard bordered by paths. He probably obtained stock from Suttor's Baulkham Hills nursery. By 1838, Rouse Hill's 'luxuriant grove of orange trees' greeted the traveller on the road to Windsor. In 1854 oranges were marketed, and more trees purchased. The potting shed on the south side of the garden probably survives from the 'orchard era'. An Englishwoman's Garden Edwin Rouse (1806-1862) and his wife Hannah, nee Hipkins, (1819-1907) inherited from Richard Rouse a plain garden of grass and some mature trees, and immediately instituted 'improvements'. Even before Edwin's death seven years later, the educated and energetic Hannah had begun to create a pleasure garden to frame the still-exposed house. The newly-canopied verandah provided shelter for pot plants and created a link between house and garden. Verandah furniture such as the steamer chairs and benches seen today date from this period. Hannah's long friendship with Margaret Browne, who, as 'Mrs Rolf Boldrewood', later wrote The Flower Garden in Australia (1893), suggests that Hannah took Mrs Browne's advice on country gardens and then added her own sense of style enhanced by European tours. Others to influence Hannah's garden may have been noted amateur botanist, the Reverend Dr William Woolls of Parramatta, and Major Thomas Wingate, husband of Edwin's sister, Eleanor. Wingate's photographic view of the eastern garden c.1859-65 shows an edged gravel path flanked with citrus, loquat, and other trees, with more citrus beyond. [1] The vista of open paddocks remained, but the picturesque 1856 bath-house indicates Hannah's vision. The summerhouse (c.1860) terminated the vista along a parallel path whose gutters carried run-off into a well beneath. An olive hedge and shrubbery on the east boundary replaced some of the orchard, turning the view inward, and establishing a microclimate. For Pleasure and Practicality When Edwin Stephen Rouse (1849-1931) married Bessie Buchanan (1843-1924) in 1874, Bessie's father gave the couple an extremely practical gift - a water system for the house and garden. It is still evident in the tankstand built to his design, and the numerous garden taps. On either side of the tankstand creeper-covered archways led to the southern section of the garden. The smaller arch, closest to the house, is still in place. [3] Aspiration to fashion is seen in the diamond-shaped rose bed [2] established at the top of the front lawn c.1890, but this was more ephemeral, disappearing by 1910. Pot plants remained integral to dry-climate gardening; geraniums, belladonna lilies, and small shrubs filled hollowed logs and corrugated iron containers. South of today's garden Edwin Stephen established fowl pens. Beyond, a short walk through the back gate from the laundry, was a fenced drying green, planted with white cedars. Behind the arcade another gravel carriage sweep was formed, with a grass circle and small areas of lawn beyond the garden fence as carefully edged as paths within the garden proper. [4] The other major construction of the 1880s was the trellis over the two eastern paths that intersect above the summerhouse: of untreated timber, the trellis cross-beams were interspersed with bush poles supporting Isabella grapes and wisteria: around the uprights grew geraniums, with roses beyond. The trellis area was used for entertaining, with Bessie Rouse conducting 'wisteria teas' beneath the bower. [5] 20th Century Blues Drought and Depression in the 1890s had an impact on the garden - lack of water and less staff saw its gradual decline in the 20th century. Bessie, and later, her daughter Nina Terry (1875-1968), maintained the sunny eastern garden with its terraced herb and asparagus beds below the bath-house. The summerhouse was still used regularly but appeared threatened by encroaching shrubbery. [6] Behind the house the white picket fence covered with clipped plumbago enhanced the view of the arcade, and by 1910 the peppercorn tree was rapidly filling the rear carriage circle with another shading the southwest corner of the house. [7] Here the path from drive to western door was marked by a small trellis covered in a yellow Banksian rose. Bessie introduced plants from her family home in 1899, a bird's nest fern and a Kentia palm. Both flourished against the eastern verandah, surrounded by pots of ferns and more delicate plants, some arrayed on the tiered plant stand now in the arcade. [8] The Kentia still looked healthy in the 1930s [9] but today ivy grows over its stump outside the dining room window. The 1930s Depression, culminating in the 1938 drought, further devastated plant stock. However, oxalis, freesias, ixias and sourgrass coloured the lawn, and blue plumbago contrasted with yellow lantana to the east of the laundry block. Along the drive the grey of the olive hedge was interspersed with red geraniums, and hardenbergia, arum lily, button flowers, morning glory, and spirea still flourished. As Miriam Hamilton remembers, in a 'good season' the garden could still look wonderful, if only for a moment. In the 1940s a fence was erected just beyond the path east of the house, and stock grazed around the summerhouse. Ornamental grasses, once confined to Edwardian-era beds, escaped into the native grasses of the lawn. The hedges grew, and the creation of the Windsor Road cutting dropped the level of the road below the garden, increasing the sense of isolation. Nina Rouse continued to garden near the house, occasionally getting help to keep paths in order, however by the 1960s she wrote there were 'too many trees here to make flower growing a success'. Maintaining Memory's Bower The garden today carries echoes of its evolution, particularly in the remnant forms of its paths and pleasure walks and structural elements such as the summerhouse that have already been retrieved. Plant stock is more problematic - with a long history of almost continual replacement it now requires active intervention to select those specimens to retain and those to reintroduce to maintain the ambience created by earlier owners. This garden is sometimes characterised as time 'standing still'. But this is something a garden does not do: as English naturalist and entomologist Miriam Rothschild has observed, 'Only time separates a garden from a nature reserve.' Time remains a potent element in the garden of Rouse Hill. Conservation Rouse Hill - the house and its furnishings, garden, paddocks, outbuildings and abandoned farm machinery - is the record of a family. Here, in built, planted and three-dimensional form is the evidence of six generations of the co-related Rouse and Terry families: diaries of lives of enterprise, leisure and hardship, of happiness and of sadness: the life of Rouse Hill from its first building in 1813 to the late 20th century. If these were written diaries, entrusted to a public archive, and the modern archivist determined to censor them, to rearrange or delete or destroy entries, to tear pages from each volume, he would be culpable of betraying his duty. And so it would be with the Historic Houses Trust, as custodians of a record of national historical importance, if it is destroyed, altered, restored. At Rouse Hill, of greatest significance is the layering of evidence of the diverse lives, tastes and circumstances of its owners over one hundred and seventy years. The Trust's primary duty is preservation: simply, to keep that record. Secondly, the Trust's duty is to convey the importance of this place to scholars and to the public. Rouse Hill is as fragile as it is complex. It is not capable of receiving large numbers of visitors, nor is that desirable if the visitor is to savour and understand the subtle weaving of time and fortune and generations that comprise its historic fabric. But it is more than a rich, timeworn tapestry. To use another analogy, one can liken much of Rouse Hill to the stack of a library of rare books, or the store of an art gallery: unseen generally, but from which scholars and historians may continually extract knowledge and ideas for studies, books and exhibitions. Its collections of domestic technology and material culture of the 19th and early 20th centuries - furniture, textiles, costume, childhood memorabilia - and domestic technology are extraordinary and have a potential for educative and exhibition use beyond the confines of the estate. In conserving Rouse Hill the Trust asks 'Will it last if nothing is done?' Not 'Do we like it?'; not 'Is it attractive?'. If the answer is 'Yes, it will last', whether in pristine or deteriorated condition, then no repair, reconstruction or restoration is done. If the answer is 'No, it will not last' - that deterioration will accelerate - then the Trust tries to find ways to stop, or to slow down, that deterioration, preferably in ways that are reversible, that cause minimum change to the existing fabric. All such repairs are discernible. Not here is there any pride in 'invisible mending' which may please and deceive the eye, but distorts the historical record of the place. This philosophy of conservation is neither new nor unique to Australia. It is the philosophy that underlies the Trust's conservation at Meroogal, Nowra, and it is a philosophy espoused more recently in England by the National Trust at Calke Abbey, Derbyshire and by English Heritage at Brodsworth Hall, also in Derbyshire, although at Rouse Hill this philosophy is applied with a rigour absent from both those grander houses. It is a radical philosophy, bred of experience and sensitivity, not of indecision and uncertainty, and it is a philosophy that is not appropriate to many places, and particularly to those in private ownership. It is appropriate to Rouse Hill because of the extraordinary significance of this place's continuity of ownership and overlays of evidence of its owners. Sadly perhaps, that ownership has now ceased. Resumption of the property by the Government and purchase of the contents has ended what was most important about the place: the continuity of ownership and the continuing contribution of those owners. If the fate of Rouse Hill had been otherwise, if it had been sold and the collection dispersed, then a very different mode of conservation - private or public - would have resulted, and if the house had continued, as some might have wished, in family ownership, yet another kind of conservation would, ideally, have prevailed: one in which change and progress, combined with respect, would have added yet another layer, a further richness. But fate and bureaucracy have now determined that the last page of these precious diaries has been written and ruled off. They are now held by the Historic Houses Trust and the Hamilton Rouse Hill Trust in trust for the nation. Fascinating, and of the utmost importance, Rouse Hill is a haunting place. When you visit here, tread softly, not only for its fragility, but because you are treading on the dreams, successes, failures and pride of a family, eavesdropping on distant conversations, prying into its secrets. The Historic Houses Trust acknowledges, with sincere appreciation, the present descendants of Richard and Elizabeth Rouse who have been dedicated to the preservation of Rouse Hill and have been understanding of a conservation philosophy that reveals their family, its history, and indeed, themselves, objectively and without romance. The Trust is aware that this is not easily acceptable and it is aware of its obligation to respect their privacy while maintaining the integrity of Rouse Hill as an archive of national historical importance. References Miriam Hamilton: recollections; family papers David Beaver (ed), Gardens of heritage significance: a collection of essays on the history, conservation & management of our garden heritage, Sydney: National Trust of Australia (NSW), 1996 James Broadbent, 'Survey of gardens in New South Wales: nominations for the Register of the National Estate', typescript, Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission, 1981 Elizabeth Maddock, Rouse Hill House resources document for garden and landscape: physical and documentary evidence, Department of Environment and Planning NSW, June (completed November 1981; draft 1983) 1985 Miriam Hamilton, Deborah Malor, Pam Prior, Rouse Hill - 'mapping the paddocks': sources by twenty-year slice, report to Historic Houses Trust, July 1998 Miriam Rothschild, 'Only time separates a garden from a nature reserve', New Scientist, 19 October 1991, 44 Memoirs of George Suttor, F.L.S.: Banksian collector (1774-1859), edited by George Mackaness, Sydney: Ford, 1948 Howard Tanner, The art of gardening in colonial Australia, Sydney: Langridge Press, 1979 Max Thompson, William Woolls: a man of Parramatta, Sydney: Hale & Iremonger, 1986 Caroline Rouse Thornton, Rouse Hill House and the Rouses, Nedlands, W.A.: Caroline Thornton, 1988 Special thanks to http://www.hht.net.au/home |
|
|
|
www.sydneyarchitecture.com |
|
links |
|