The shadowy but awesome image of ancient Egypt
has haunted Western civilisation for the last two thousand years. The
pyramid form was used in imperial Rome for funerary monuments; the Emperor
Hadrian collected and displayed Egyptiana at his villa at Tivoli; ancient
obelisks were re-erected at many civic focal points in Rome during the
seventeenth century, one of them in the very centre of Bernini’s huge
forecourt to St Peter’s Cathedral; Piranesi designed ‘Egyptian’ fireplaces
and chimney-pieces in the eighteenth century.
A decorative, Rococo use of Egyptian motifs was well estabished in Europe by
the end of the eighteenth century, but the archaeological basis for an
Egyptian revival came from one of the lasting achievements of Napoleon
Bonaparte’s few short years in Egypt between 1798 and 1802—the staggering,
twenty-one-volume Description d’Egypte.
During the first half of the nineteenth century, the Egyptian Revival was
observable as a minor, ‘alternative’ idiom in Britain, France, Italy and
Germany. The style made a strong showing in the United States, where one of
its major monuments was John Haviland’s lowering, ponderous New York Halls
ofJustice and House of Detention (succinctly dubbed ‘The Tombs’). One should
not forget, either, that on the main axis of the Mall in Washington, DC,
rises the colossal nineteenth- century obelisk of the Washington Monument.
Several ‘Egyptian’ synagogues were build in the United States in the early
1840s, and at about the same time three synagogues using the style appeared
in Australia—in Hobart [fl], Launceston [] and Sydney [79] (the Sydney
synagogue being demolished in about 1918). An attempt was being made, it
seemed, to establish a Jewish synagogue style, and ‘Egyptian’ was a reminder
that in ancient times the Children of Israel had learned architecture the
hard way as they toiled in captivity to build for the Pharaoh.
The rules of the Egyptian style were not difficult to learn. A generally
weighty feeling was obligatory, with large areas of blank, solid wall. Where
possible, walls were to be built with a ‘batter’, or slope inwards towards
their tops, and window openings were to have a similar, upward-tapering
shape. Crowning the wall, a large concave (cavetto) cornice was required.
The principal entrance was to be flanked by a pair of massive Egyptian
columns displaying either the lotus or the papyrus on their capitals.
When a monument rather than a building was required, the needle-like
Egyptian obelisk had three great virtues: it was a familiar shape, it made a
prominent landmark, and it needed very little space. Beside Sydney’s Hyde
Park, a lofty obelisk both commemorates a lord mayor and serves as a
sewerage vent
Examples
Obelisk, Captain Cook’s landing place, Kurnell, NSW. Architect unknown,
1870. A interpretation, in sandstone ashlar, of an ancient monolithic
obelisk.
The Synagogue, St John Street, Launceston, Tas. Architect unknown, i8. The
Egyptian temple form expressed in brickwork.